NIC-400 AXI4 Outstanding Transactions and ASIB AWREADY Behavior
The core issue revolves around the configuration of outstanding transactions in an AXI4-based system using the ARM NIC-400 interconnect. The user reports that despite configuring the master (m0_axi4) to support up to 16 outstanding transactions and the slave to accept the same, the system only processes 3 transactions before the AWREADY signal from the ASIB (AXI Slave Interface Block) is pulled low. This behavior disrupts the expected flow of transactions, as the system must wait for the completion of a write data transfer before initiating the next transaction. This effectively nullifies the outstanding transaction capability, which is critical for achieving high-performance data transfers in AXI4 systems.
The NIC-400 interconnect is designed to manage multiple AXI4 transactions efficiently, but its behavior is highly dependent on the configuration of its components, including the ASIB, CDAS (Cyclic Dependency Avoidance Scheme), and the switch modules. The AWREADY signal going low after only 3 transactions suggests a bottleneck or misconfiguration in the interconnect’s handling of transaction dependencies or flow control. This issue is further complicated by the presence of registering in the ASIB and potential CDAS settings that may restrict transaction routing.
ASIB Registering and CDAS Configuration Constraints
The root cause of the issue lies in the interaction between the ASIB registering and the CDAS configuration. The ASIB registering is designed to store a limited number of transactions temporarily, which can lead to backpressure if the downstream components cannot process transactions at the expected rate. In this case, the ASIB appears to be configured to store only 2 transactions, which, combined with the CDAS settings, results in the system processing only 3 transactions before stalling.
The CDAS configuration plays a critical role in determining how transactions are routed through the NIC-400 interconnect. If the CDAS is set to "Single Slave" mode, the interconnect will only allow transactions targeting the same output port to be outstanding simultaneously. If the transactions alternate between different output ports, the CDAS will enforce a serialization of transactions, causing the AWREADY signal to go low until the current transaction completes. Similarly, if the CDAS is set to "Single Slave Per ID" mode, transactions must use unique AWID values to target different output ports concurrently. Failure to adhere to these constraints will result in the observed behavior.
Additionally, the switch0 module’s configuration may contribute to the issue. If the switch is not configured to handle the expected number of outstanding transactions, it will apply backpressure to the ASIB, causing the AWREADY signal to go low. This backpressure can propagate through the system, leading to inefficient transaction processing and reduced throughput.
Optimizing NIC-400 Configuration for AXI4 Outstanding Transactions
To resolve the issue, the NIC-400 configuration must be carefully reviewed and adjusted to support the desired number of outstanding transactions. The following steps outline the necessary actions to achieve this:
-
Review ASIB Registering Configuration: Ensure that the ASIB is configured to store a sufficient number of transactions to match the master’s outstanding capability. If the ASIB is currently set to store only 2 transactions, increase this value to align with the master’s configuration of 16 outstanding transactions. This will reduce the likelihood of backpressure due to insufficient buffering.
-
Adjust CDAS Settings: Evaluate the CDAS configuration for switch0 and other relevant components. If the CDAS is set to "Single Slave" mode, consider whether this setting is necessary for the application. If transactions target multiple output ports, switch to "Single Slave Per ID" mode and ensure that unique AWID values are used for transactions targeting different ports. This will allow multiple transactions to proceed concurrently without violating the CDAS constraints.
-
Verify Switch Configuration: Confirm that switch0 is configured to handle the expected number of outstanding transactions. If the switch is applying backpressure after only 3 transactions, it may be necessary to increase its buffering capacity or adjust its arbitration settings to prioritize transaction flow.
-
Monitor AWREADY and Transaction Flow: Use simulation or debugging tools to monitor the AWREADY signal and transaction flow through the NIC-400 interconnect. This will help identify any additional bottlenecks or misconfigurations that may be contributing to the issue. Pay particular attention to the timing of the AWREADY signal and the behavior of the ASIB and switch modules.
-
Consult ARM Support: If the issue persists, leverage ARM’s licensee support resources to obtain detailed guidance on NIC-400 configuration. Provide the NIC-400 configuration file and any relevant simulation or debugging data to facilitate a thorough analysis of the system.
By addressing these configuration issues, the system can be optimized to support the desired number of outstanding transactions, improving overall performance and ensuring efficient data transfer in AXI4-based systems. The key is to align the NIC-400 configuration with the system’s transaction requirements and to carefully manage dependencies and flow control to avoid bottlenecks.
Detailed Analysis of NIC-400 Configuration Parameters
To further understand the issue, it is essential to delve into the specific configuration parameters of the NIC-400 interconnect and their impact on transaction handling. The following table summarizes the key parameters and their implications:
Parameter | Description | Impact on Outstanding Transactions |
---|---|---|
ASIB Registering Depth | Number of transactions the ASIB can store temporarily | Insufficient depth leads to backpressure and reduced outstanding transaction capability |
CDAS Mode | Determines how transactions are routed based on target ports and IDs | Incorrect mode restricts concurrent transactions, causing AWREADY to go low prematurely |
Switch Buffering | Capacity of the switch to handle multiple transactions simultaneously | Inadequate buffering results in backpressure and limits the number of outstanding transactions |
AWID Usage | Unique identifiers for transactions targeting different output ports | Reusing AWID values in "Single Slave Per ID" mode prevents concurrent transactions |
Arbitration Settings | Rules for prioritizing transaction flow through the interconnect | Poor arbitration can lead to inefficient transaction handling and increased latency |
By carefully adjusting these parameters, the NIC-400 interconnect can be configured to support the desired number of outstanding transactions, ensuring efficient data transfer and optimal system performance.
Conclusion
The issue of limited outstanding transactions in an AXI4-based system using the NIC-400 interconnect is primarily due to misconfigurations in the ASIB registering and CDAS settings. By increasing the ASIB registering depth, adjusting the CDAS mode, and verifying the switch configuration, the system can be optimized to support the desired number of outstanding transactions. Additionally, monitoring the AWREADY signal and transaction flow, and consulting ARM support if necessary, will help ensure a robust and efficient implementation. Proper configuration of the NIC-400 interconnect is critical for achieving high-performance data transfer in AXI4 systems, and careful attention to these details will resolve the observed issues.